One Million Strong
Building a Movement for Progressive Change


Home     About Us     Getting Started     Donate     RSS Feed     Subscribe via Email     Blogroll    

USAspending.gov and Obama's reform track record

by: barath

Thu Dec 13, 2007 at 23:25:28 PM CST


( - promoted by psericks)

I've posted a substantially revised version of this diary HERE.

Today witnessed the launch of USAspending.gov, which was created by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act by Tom Coburn and Barack Obama. The site enables tracking of $1 trillion in federal spending on contracts, grants, earmarks, and loans. The bill faced serious opposition, including anonymous holds by some of the biggest porkbarrel spenders (including Ted Stevens), but in the end, Coburn and Obama prevailed.

So what kind of data does this site give us? Well, how about the top 100 recipients of federal money, or say which congresspeople rake in the most pork. And that's just scratching the surface.

And, to my surprise (especially for a government site), an API is available to make it easy to extract data.

Read on for more examples and some implications.
barath :: USAspending.gov and Obama's reform track record
The site is clearly a treasure trove of data and is a huge step forward towards government accountability. What's also nice is how user friendly it is.

Let's look at a few examples of what we can dig up.

Example 1: The list of transactions with KBR, Inc. (formerly part of Halliburton) in 2007. This came out to a paltry sum of $2.7 billion dollars (so far this year), which is nothing compared to previous years as the bar graph on the summary page shows.

Example 2: No bid contracts are among the darkest corners of federal spending - the lack of competition in these contracts is in large part what leads to overcharging by contractors and waste of taxpayer dollars. Well, there was $30 billion in no-bid contracts in 2007, including money to some companies I had never heard of, including $1.2 billion to Armor Holdings, Inc. and, strangely, $163 million to the government of Canada.

Example 3: Half of the difficulty in keeping our government accountable is being able to separate the wheat from the chaff - that is, being able to get at the data for the above-the-board stuff that goes on so we can focus in on the under-the-table dealings that are inevitably taking place. Without the data, it's hard to separate the two. In the "unknown" category of spending includes $2.6 billion for guided missiles, mostly to Lockheed and Raytheon.

There are a million more examples, and I'm really looking forward to seeing them in the coming weeks and months. It's hard to say whether this will change the ways contractors behave and porkbarrel spending is done, but it will expose no-bid contracts to a greater extent than has been done in the past, and moreover, will enable ordinary Americans to help be watchdogs.

All in all, I'm very happy to see another positive step towards government transparency, something that Sen. Obama has been a leader in.

Finally - I have one challenge to everyone - find one interesting, strange, or otherwise noteworthy pieces of spending using the site, and post it in a comment.
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Great diary (4.00 / 1)
I've recommended it both here and at Daily Kos.  The site looks intuitive and easy to use -- the first thing I did was look at Blackwater USA's FY 2006 contracts.  The amount of money in "unknown" contracts is so large the pie chart breakdown looks like a silhouette of Pac-Man.

http://www.usaspending.gov/fpd...


I hope the system (0.00 / 0)
holds up to the potential pounding it will get from people using the API.  In any case, this is great news showing how Obama is delivered.  Obama will continue to capture voters with this kind of development.  It could have enormous  weight with independents.

Searching by Congressional district (4.00 / 1)
Tom Delay's District 22 in Texas:

When did Tom Delay become majority leader?  Late 2002.  

Contracts surged after he became majority and until he resigned from the House in 2006.  In 2006, over 80% of federal contracts to his district were no-bid.  You can also look up the recipients of the funds.


can i use this example? (0.00 / 0)
could I use this example in an updated version of the diary?

it looks like I posted it at Daily Kos at a bad time of night and the diary is mostly buried.  I would like to make a more extensive list of examples and some more discussion, that your example is great.


[ Parent ]
Sure, of course (0.00 / 0)
Did you see the example on the front page of DKos?  The sixfold surge of executive branch spending on paper-shredders:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/...

=)


[ Parent ]
Pretty neat tools (0.00 / 0)
Most useful for government watchdog groups and journalists.  It's a little opaque for ordinary citizens to use, though I am impressed by all of the different ways you can search the data.  By state, by congressional district, by contractor, by year, etc. etc.

I was impressed with the number of grants (4.00 / 2)
to universities.  If you search federal "Assistance," the top 100 recipients are mostly universities and state welfare agencies.  

Ranked at #4 is Johns Hopkins University, a private university but that received $685 million in federal assistance in 2007.  Where is it all going?  Medical research:

Top 5 Programs:
93.855: Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation Research $64,228,489

93.283: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention_Investigations and Technical Assistance $43,313,489

93.837: Heart and Vascular Diseases Research $42,126,511

93.242: Mental Health Research Grants $40,273,686

93.853: Extramural Research Programs in the Neurosciences and Neurological Disorders $38,115,168

But it's really impressive to me:  UC San Francisco $500 million, UPenn, UMichigan, UCLA --- all close to $500 million in assistance in 2007.  Yale University received $378,348,659.


2007 not over yet (0.00 / 0)
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

You could tinker with this search engine for days...


[ Parent ]
great blog but (0.00 / 0)
When i find blogs like this i think its always best to add the links with the clickable links because it makes it easier to copy paste to be able to pass it to sites where the clickcable links don't work.

SEE BELOW

USAspending.gov and Obama's reform track record
http://www.onemillionstrong.us...

Today witnessed the launch of USAspending.gov,= http://www.usaspending.gov/

which was created by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

by Tom Coburn and Barack Obama. The site enables tracking of $1 trillion in federal spending on contracts, grants, earmarks, and loans. The bill faced serious opposition, including anonymous holds by some of the biggest porkbarrel spenders (including Ted Stevens), but in the end, Coburn and Obama prevailed.

So what kind of data does this site give us? Well, how about the top 100 recipients of federal money, = http://www.usaspending.gov/fpd...

or say which congresspeople rake in the most pork. =  http://www.usaspending.gov/fpd...
And that's just scratching the surface.

And, to my surprise (especially for a government site), an API is available  =  http://www.usaspending.gov/api...
to make it easy to extract data.

Read on for more examples and some implications.
barath :: USAspending.gov and Obama's reform track record = http://www.onemillionstrong.us...
The site is clearly a treasure trove of data and is a huge step forward towards government accountability. What's also nice is how user friendly it is.

Let's look at a few examples of what we can dig up.

Example 1: The list of transactions with KBR, Inc. (formerly part of Halliburton) in 2007 = http://tinyurl.com/27xroh . This came out to a paltry sum of $2.7 billion dollars (so far this year), which is nothing compared to previous years as the bar graph on the summary page  = http://tinyurl.com/yq39cq shows.

Example 2: No bid contracts are among the darkest corners of federal spending - the lack of competition in these contracts is in large part what leads to overcharging by contractors and waste of taxpayer dollars. Well, there was $30 billion in no-bid contracts in 2007 =  http://tinyurl.com/2x2225 , including money to some companies I had never heard of, including $1.2 billion to Armor Holdings, Inc.  =  http://tinyurl.com/248loz and, strangely, $163 million to the government of Canada. = http://tinyurl.com/28amw3

Example 3: Half of the difficulty in keeping our government accountable is being able to separate the wheat from the chaff - that is, being able to get at the data for the above-the-board stuff that goes on so we can focus in on the under-the-table dealings that are inevitably taking place. Without the data, it's hard to separate the two. In the "unknown" category of spending includes $2.6 billion for guided missiles,  =  http://tinyurl.com/yv74mc   mostly to Lockheed and Raytheon.

There are a million more examples, and I'm really looking forward to seeing them in the coming weeks and months. It's hard to say whether this will change the ways contractors behave and porkbarrel spending is done, but it will expose no-bid contracts to a greater extent than has been done in the past, and moreover, will enable ordinary Americans to help be watchdogs.

All in all, I'm very happy to see another positive step towards government transparency, something that Sen. Obama has been a leader in.

Finally - I have one challenge to everyone - find one interesting, strange, or otherwise noteworthy pieces of spending using the site, and post it in a comment.

Tags: Barack Obama, open government, ethics reform,


You can also copy and paste links (0.00 / 0)
by clicking right-click on each and then selecting "Copy Link Location."

If you have a Mac, it's hold down the control button and click, then select "copy link location."


[ Parent ]
Thats what i did (0.00 / 0)
But i shouldn't have to do that as that takes a lot of time and i am working many sites. I need a quick way to pass important info such as here to many people.

Many times i don't want the people to see everyones comments so having not to copy paste each link like i did would make it easier for me to email to others.

oh well  


[ Parent ]
I'm working on an updated version of this diary (0.00 / 0)
I felt it was a bit incomplete...I'll post the updated version in a day or two.

I WROTE A BLOG ON YOUR BLOG + ADDED MORE (0.00 / 0)
"USAspending.gov Barack Obama's New Gov Site + His reform track record + Best Of Obama's Transparent Gov Bills" http://my.barackobama.com/page...

Today Dec 13th 2007 witnessed the launch of USAspending.gov,= http://www.usaspending.gov/

which was created by the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

by Tom Coburn and Barack Obama. The site enables tracking of $1 trillion in federal spending on contracts, grants, earmarks, and loans. The bill faced serious opposition, including anonymous holds by some of the biggest porkbarrel spenders (including Ted Stevens), but in the end, Coburn and Obama prevailed.

So what kind of data does this site give us? Well, how about the top 100 recipients of federal money, = http://www.usaspending.gov/fpd...

or say which congresspeople rake in the most pork. =  http://www.usaspending.gov/fpd...
And that's just scratching the surface.
And, to my surprise (especially for a government site), an API is available  =  http://www.usaspending.gov/api...
to make it easy to extract data.

Read on for more examples and some implications.
USAspending.gov and Obama's reform track record = http://www.onemillionstrong.us...
The site is clearly a treasure trove of data and is a huge step forward towards government accountability. What's also nice is how user friendly it is.

Let's look at a few examples of what we can dig up.

Example 1: The list of transactions with KBR, Inc. (formerly part of Halliburton) in 2007 = http://tinyurl.com/27xroh . This came out to a paltry sum of $2.7 billion dollars (so far this year), which is nothing compared to previous years as the bar graph on the summary page  = http://tinyurl.com/yq39cq shows

Example 2: No bid contracts are among the darkest corners of federal spending - the lack of competition in these contracts is in large part what leads to overcharging by contractors and waste of taxpayer dollars. Well, there was $30 billion in no-bid contracts in 2007 =  http://tinyurl.com/2x2225 , including money to some companies I had never heard of, including $1.2 billion to Armor Holdings, Inc.  =  http://tinyurl.com/248loz and, strangely, $163 million to the government of Canada. = http://tinyurl.com/28amw3

There are a million more examples, and I'm really looking forward to seeing them in the coming weeks and months.  

I'm very happy to see another positive step towards government transparency, something that Sen. Obama has been a leader in.

I have one challenge to everyone - find one interesting, strange, or otherwise noteworthy pieces of spending using the site.

"REPOSTED FROM HERE" http://www.onemillionstrong.us...



that is my 400 word copy (0.00 / 0)
400 words for the obama site headquarters blog comment section

[ Parent ]
here is long version (0.00 / 0)
"USAspending.gov Barack Obama's New Gov Site + His reform track record + Best Of Obama's Transparent Gov Bills" http://my.barackobama.com/page...



[ Parent ]
OKAY! (0.00 / 0)
I've posted a substantially revised version of this diary here:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/...


WOW! (0.00 / 0)
This story should be a permanent link! Outstanding work!

 Subscribe in a reader

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


One Million Strong Staff
Admins
psericks
jlarson

Editors
Vermonter
Geekesque

Search




Advanced Search


Obama Blogosphere

Advertising

Powered by: SoapBlox