One Million Strong
Building a Movement for Progressive Change


Home     About Us     Getting Started     Donate     RSS Feed     Subscribe via Email     Blogroll    

Part I: Obama Roadmap to the White House

by: wizinit

Fri May 16, 2008 at 16:34:42 PM CDT


( - promoted by jlarson)

 

Blindsided by Hope

 

Many Americans, and not just those close to Hillary Clinton, are surprised that Barack Obama has emerged as the “presumptive” Democratic Party nominee for President in the 2008 election.  But those of us who have been paying close attention to the candidate and his campaign know it is no fluke.  This article explains how Obama planned and won the nomination.  In subsequent articles I will try to anticipate the contest with John McCain and what the start of an Obama Administration could look like.

 

Largely lost in the Sturm und Drang of this historic campaign is the fact that Obama has consistently pursued a clear-cut strategy.  It is a strategy unanticipated by Halperin and Harris in their 2006 epic fable of the looming contest between the politics of Clinton vs. Rove, The Way to Win: Taking the White House in 2008.  And their -- for that matter, the entire mainstream media’s -- failure to anticipate Obama’s so-far successful candidacy is not just a reminder of the shortcomings of conventional wisdom and inside-the-Beltway punditry.  It also a warning that we may be in a historic shift  which, after the last vote is counted, will indicate that the American electorate is fed up with the heretofore successful Freak Show formula Halperin and Harris describe and that  dominated Washington politics over the past two decades.

 
wizinit :: Part I: Obama Roadmap to the White House

Obama’s 11 Principles

 

The basic ingredients for Obama’s success were a new, authentic political candidate and a country desperate for Change.  But then there is the process of getting nominated and elected. 

Regardless of who designed the electoral strategy and have so far effectively carried it out, Barack Obama himself ultimately bears responsibility for its success or failure.  But here are eleven organizational principles of the Obama ’08 campaign I have identified that help explain how far he has come to date:

 

1.         Conduct campaign like a business

2.         Eschew staff “drama”

3.         Apply community organization techniques

4.         Ground game is to identify supporters, register voters and get-out-the-vote

5.         Where practical, use motivated volunteers

6.         Emphasize “early states,” paying particular attention to Iowa as first contest

7.         “Free media” trumps paid media

8.         Ride momentum of early successes

9.         Compete for delegates in every contest

10.       Maximize results down to the congressional district level

11.       Grass roots can trump party establishment and machinery

 

The Clinton Myth Unmasked

 

The Obama campaign’s most important achievement has been largely obscured by the media’s coverage of the contest.  He attracted experienced strategists and field operatives from earlier contests to his Chicago headquarters, and received the first clear indicator he could succeed in fundraising when his “early money” rivaled Clinton’s “old money”. 

 

No one anticipated, however, that Obama would achieve his initial and most important electoral objective, and prevent Hillary Clinton from effectively winning any of the four “early states.”  After all, in delegate counts, she came in third in Iowa, tied in NH, lost NV by one, and was trounced in SC.  It is only the media’s acceptance of the revisionist myth spun by her campaign into widely-believed truth, that the contest was close, and the distraction of the subsequent blood match that has disguised this fact.  And only those who have worked with them in Washington could anticipate the desperate measures that Clintons would resort to against Obama before the race for the Democratic nomination would end.  They took a calculated gamble by tossing their most loyal constituency under the bus, the African American community that stuck with Bill Clinton through his darkest hours and was mostly pro-Hillary when the contest started.  The gamble failed and ultimately backfired.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
3,4,5,6 + 11 ,12 (0.00 / 0)
We all did our part my parts were in 3,4,5,6 + 11

3 = going to camp obama
4 = hold many early ,mid and late events in early states and even in late states like Pa knowing Hillary would never back down and it would come to Pa eventually
5 = drive to early states and sleep in car as long as i got there to help in some way or another
6 = is where each one of us kept up our part in some state not knowing how many others were doing their part but in the end we would all find out with the results on election night
11 = Keeping in touch with all both online and in person and show ability to never back down
12 = meeting wiznit and knowing there were others out there like myself :)


I am not in a position to dedicate as much time . . . (0.00 / 0)

. . . and energy as those less tied down and with obligations, but I do what I can.

Myself, I do my part . . .

11 = Grass roots can trump party establishment and machinery

I am firmly in the Obama camp.

If we're the one's we've been waiting for . . . then what are we waiting for?!


BTW (4.00 / 1)
Wizinit . . . I appreciate this post very, very much.

Thank you.

If we're the one's we've been waiting for . . . then what are we waiting for?!


Spot On! (0.00 / 0)
Wizinit, it's great to compare your incisive cut-to-the-chase analysis with what passes for punditry.  You just demolished HRC's claim of "ready-from-day-one experience" like Chris Matthews demolished that poor right-wing radio jock who never heard of Neville Chamberlain.  The fact is, Obama won because he never lets his eyes off the prize; Clinton lost in the fog of her own smug orthodoxy.

You should expand this into a longer piece for a Sunday magazine or something.
CW


I wonder . . . (0.00 / 0)

. . . what he and his staff have in store regarding management of the Executive Branch of the Federal government?

Oh!  The possibilities!!!

Takes one's breath away . . .

If we're the one's we've been waiting for . . . then what are we waiting for?!


 Subscribe in a reader

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


One Million Strong Staff
Admins
psericks
jlarson

Editors
Vermonter
Geekesque

Search




Advanced Search


Obama Blogosphere

Advertising

Powered by: SoapBlox